Incognet, comparedSame instincts. Different scale, and a different jurisdiction mix.

Incognet is one of the few hosts on this list whose privacy position reads as conviction rather than positioning, and it accepts Monero properly. The differences are footprint, structure and how much is published.

7 minute read · Their pages last read 30 juillet 2026 · Corrections welcome

The one you are looking at

Incognet

Where: Iceland, United States
Site: incognet.io

What they are genuinely good at

A real privacy posture, with Monero treated as a first-class payment method.
Signup that asks for very little, stated plainly and without conditions buried below.
Responsive, human support of the kind a small operation can actually deliver.

This estate

DediPrivacy

Where: eight jurisdictions, eight companies
Site: dediprivacy.com

What we publish that most do not

Every price, including bare metal, GPU by the second and colocation.
A signed warrant canary, a quarterly transparency report and the inventory of records that exist.
Mitigation on before an attack starts, and an SLA that credits itself from the incident record.

Row by row

What each of us publishes.

Not what each of us believes. Every row below is a page you can open on either site, or an answer that is not there.

Their column reflects their own public pages, read on 30 juillet 2026. marks a thing we could not find published — it is not a claim that they do not do it.
Published?	Incognet	DediPrivacy
Sign up without identity documents No name, no address, no document, at any spend level.	Published	Published
Settles in cryptocurrency Accepted as payment, not as a gift-card workaround.	Published	Published
Accepts Monero The only widely accepted asset that is private by default.	Published	Published
Every price published The whole catalogue on a page, with no “contact us” tier.	Published	Published
Signed warrant canary Cryptographically signed, dated, and on a schedule.	Not published	Published
Transparency report with figures Notices received, and how many were acted on.	Not published	Published
Law-enforcement guide published The inventory of records that exist, before you ask.	Partly	Published
Log retention stated as a number Hours or days, not “minimal” or “as required”.	Partly	Published
A separate legal entity per jurisdiction So a judgment in one country does not reach the servers in another.	Not published	Published
Uptime SLA credited automatically Credited from the published incident record, with no claim form.	Not published	Published
DDoS mitigation included On every product, at no extra charge, with no protected-IP upsell.	Partly	Published
Bare metal, GPU and colocation Beyond virtual machines, on the same account and policy.	Partly	Published

On eight of the twelve rows above, this estate publishes an answer and we could not find one published there. Tell us if a row is wrong

The US region is the one thing to think about

Incognet publishes Icelandic and United States locations. The Icelandic side is outside US reach; the US side is not, and no policy changes that. It is a perfectly reasonable product for most content and a poor one for content that attracts complaints.

Every region on this estate is outside United States jurisdiction, and each is held by a separate company. That is the claim, and the entity list is where you check it.

Where we are honestly similar

On the questions that matter most to a privacy-minded buyer — no documents, real crypto, Monero accepted, prices on the page — there is very little between us, and the table says so. It would be easy to manufacture a difference here and it would be obvious.

The real difference is the published layer: a canary on a schedule, a transparency report with figures, a retention number in hours, an SLA that credits itself. Those are things a larger operation can afford to maintain, and they are the reason to pay more.

Questions people actually ask

Is a bigger host better for privacy?

Not inherently, and often the opposite. What scale buys is the ability to maintain documents that cost real work — a quarterly report is only useful if it appears every quarter, including the dull ones.

Do you take Monero?

Yes, and it is one of eight assets on the payments page. It is also the only one of them that is private by default, and we say so rather than listing it among the others as though they were equivalent.

Buy theirs instead if

You want a small operation you can talk to, and that is worth more to you than a published record.
Iceland plus a US option is the right shape and the US side does not worry you.
One or two virtual machines is the whole requirement and always will be.

That list is here because a comparison that cannot name a reason to buy the other one is an advertisement. If any of those three is you, they are the better buy and this page has done its job.

Every price on this estate is published in full, in one place. See the whole catalogue