BuyVM, comparedBuyVM earns its reputation. Three rows are worth your attention.

BuyVM has spent a decade being straight with people and charging less than it could, and the community goodwill it has is earned rather than bought. If you are already happy there, this page is not trying to change that. It is three specific differences.

8 minute read · Their pages last read 30 juillet 2026 · Corrections welcome

The one you are looking at

BuyVM

Where
Luxembourg, United States
Site
buyvm.net

What they are genuinely good at

  • Price. On raw virtual machines and storage slabs, very little in this market competes and we do not pretend to.
  • A long public record of straight answers, visible support and no surprise policy changes.
  • Storage that is priced honestly per terabyte rather than as a premium tier.

This estate

DediPrivacy

Where
eight jurisdictions, eight companies
Site
dediprivacy.com

What we publish that most do not

  • Every price, including bare metal, GPU by the second and colocation.
  • A signed warrant canary, a quarterly transparency report and the inventory of records that exist.
  • Mitigation on before an attack starts, and an SLA that credits itself from the incident record.

Row by row

What each of us publishes.

Not what each of us believes. Every row below is a page you can open on either site, or an answer that is not there.

Their column reflects their own public pages, read on 30 juillet 2026. marks a thing we could not find published — it is not a claim that they do not do it.
Published? BuyVM DediPrivacy
Sign up without identity documents No name, no address, no document, at any spend level. Partly Published
Settles in cryptocurrency Accepted as payment, not as a gift-card workaround. Published Published
Accepts Monero The only widely accepted asset that is private by default. Not published Published
Every price published The whole catalogue on a page, with no “contact us” tier. Published Published
Signed warrant canary Cryptographically signed, dated, and on a schedule. Not published Published
Transparency report with figures Notices received, and how many were acted on. Not published Published
Law-enforcement guide published The inventory of records that exist, before you ask. Not published Published
Log retention stated as a number Hours or days, not “minimal” or “as required”. Not published Published
A separate legal entity per jurisdiction So a judgment in one country does not reach the servers in another. Not published Published
Uptime SLA credited automatically Credited from the published incident record, with no claim form. Partly Published
DDoS mitigation included On every product, at no extra charge, with no protected-IP upsell. Partly Published
Bare metal, GPU and colocation Beyond virtual machines, on the same account and policy. Partly Published

On ten of the twelve rows above, this estate publishes an answer and we could not find one published there. Tell us if a row is wrong

Mitigation as a product, or mitigation as a default

BuyVM offers DDoS filtering, and it works. It is structured the way most of this industry structures it: a protected address is something you add to the order.

This estate does it the other way round. Mitigation is on at every edge, on every product, at no extra charge, and there is no per-attack fee and no protected-IP tier. That is not generosity; it is that an attack arrives before you have time to buy anything, and a mitigation you have to enable is a mitigation that is off when it is needed.

The jurisdiction question is a real one here

BuyVM publishes Luxembourg and United States locations. The Luxembourg estate is genuinely outside the reach of a US takedown notice. The US one is not, and cannot be, whatever any host’s policy says — a company with US operations answers a US subpoena.

If your content is ordinary, that is a non-issue and the price wins. If your content attracts complaints, the choice of building matters more than the choice of host, and every one of this estate’s eight regions is outside United States jurisdiction with a separate company behind it.

What you are paying the difference for

We are more expensive on a like-for-like virtual machine and it would be silly to claim otherwise. What the difference buys is the published side: an SLA that credits automatically, a quarterly transparency report, a signed canary, mitigation already on, and a path from a virtual machine to bare metal, GPU or a rack without changing supplier.

If none of those are worth a few dollars a month to you, BuyVM is a better buy and this page has done its job by saying so.

Questions people actually ask

Is BuyVM cheaper?

On virtual machines and storage, generally yes. We are not competing on that number and a comparison page that claimed otherwise would be checkable in thirty seconds.

Does BuyVM require identity documents?

Not as a rule, but orders can be held for fraud review, which is why the row above reads “partly” rather than yes. This estate never asks at any spend level, which is a policy rather than a default.

Can I keep a machine at each and see?

That is the sensible thing to do and it costs less than a month of arguing about it. Our whole price list is published and there is a 72-hour refund.

Buy theirs instead if

  • Price per gigabyte is the number you are optimising, and a US-jurisdiction option is not a problem for your content.
  • You want a large storage slab cheaply and are comfortable managing the policy question yourself.
  • You value a long community track record over a published process document.

That list is here because a comparison that cannot name a reason to buy the other one is an advertisement. If any of those three is you, they are the better buy and this page has done its job.

Every price on this estate is published in full, in one place. See the whole catalogue