Compute
Platform
Content
Compute
Platform
Also available
DediPrivacy
Resources
No KYC · No DMCA regime · Crypto settlement only
Zomro is priced keenly and sells the Netherlands, which is a sound answer to an American complainant. The comparison is almost entirely about documentation.
The one you are looking at
zomro.comWhat they are genuinely good at
This estate
dediprivacy.comWhat we publish that most do not
Row by row
Not what each of us believes. Every row below is a page you can open on either site, or an answer that is not there.
| Published? | Zomro | DediPrivacy |
|---|---|---|
| Sign up without identity documents No name, no address, no document, at any spend level. | Partly | Published |
| Settles in cryptocurrency Accepted as payment, not as a gift-card workaround. | Published | Published |
| Accepts Monero The only widely accepted asset that is private by default. | Not published | Published |
| Every price published The whole catalogue on a page, with no “contact us” tier. | Published | Published |
| Signed warrant canary Cryptographically signed, dated, and on a schedule. | Not published | Published |
| Transparency report with figures Notices received, and how many were acted on. | Not published | Published |
| Law-enforcement guide published The inventory of records that exist, before you ask. | Not published | Published |
| Log retention stated as a number Hours or days, not “minimal” or “as required”. | Not published | Published |
| A separate legal entity per jurisdiction So a judgment in one country does not reach the servers in another. | No | Published |
| Uptime SLA credited automatically Credited from the published incident record, with no claim form. | Published | Published |
| DDoS mitigation included On every product, at no extra charge, with no protected-IP upsell. | Partly | Published |
| Bare metal, GPU and colocation Beyond virtual machines, on the same account and policy. | Published | Published |
On eight of the twelve rows above, this estate publishes an answer and we could not find one published there. Tell us if a row is wrong
A Dutch company is outside 17 U.S.C. §512 and inside a developed European notice-and-action practice. Sold as "offshore", that is accurate about America and quiet about Europe.
We run a Dutch region for the same reasons — capacity and latency — and do not describe it as the most resistant of the eight. Panama and Iceland are, for different reasons, and saying which is which is more useful than claiming all eight are equal.
No canary, no transparency figures, no record inventory and no retention number that we could find. That is the ordinary state of this market and it is precisely what these comparisons exist to make visible: a count of demands, by quarter is either published or it is not.
One company holding every server means one court reaches all of them. Eight companies is the expensive answer to that, and it is the one structural thing in this market that is hard to copy quickly.
On a like-for-like virtual machine, yes. The difference buys mitigation that is already on, an SLA that credits itself and a published record. If none of those matter to you, buy the cheaper one.
Largely. The migration service is free and an engineer runs the sync and the cutover.
Buy theirs instead if
That list is here because a comparison that cannot name a reason to buy the other one is an advertisement. If any of those three is you, they are the better buy and this page has done its job.
Every price on this estate is published in full, in one place. See the whole catalogue
Sold on the takedown question. Where the jurisdiction is real, and where it is a policy on a server somewhere ordinary.
