Sign in Deploy a server

KoDDoS, comparedThey sell mitigation. We include it and publish the rest.

KoDDoS built its business on absorbing attacks, and for a target that is genuinely under fire that focus is worth something. The comparison is about what comes with it.

7 minute read · Their pages last read 30 July 2026 · Corrections welcome

The one you are looking at

KoDDoS

Where
Netherlands, Hong Kong
Site
koddos.net

What they are genuinely good at

  • Mitigation as a specialism rather than a checkbox, with capacity and experience behind it.
  • Hong Kong capacity, which is a real answer for Asian audiences and rare in this field.
  • A clear focus: they are not pretending to be a general cloud.

This estate

DediPrivacy

Where
eight jurisdictions, eight companies
Site
dediprivacy.com

What we publish that most do not

  • Every price, including bare metal, GPU by the second and colocation.
  • A signed warrant canary, a quarterly transparency report and the inventory of records that exist.
  • Mitigation on before an attack starts, and an SLA that credits itself from the incident record.

Row by row

What each of us publishes.

Not what each of us believes. Every row below is a page you can open on either site, or an answer that is not there.

Their column reflects their own public pages, read on 30 July 2026. marks a thing we could not find published — it is not a claim that they do not do it.
Published? KoDDoS DediPrivacy
Sign up without identity documents No name, no address, no document, at any spend level. Partly Published
Settles in cryptocurrency Accepted as payment, not as a gift-card workaround. Published Published
Accepts Monero The only widely accepted asset that is private by default. Not published Published
Every price published The whole catalogue on a page, with no “contact us” tier. Partly Published
Signed warrant canary Cryptographically signed, dated, and on a schedule. Not published Published
Transparency report with figures Notices received, and how many were acted on. Not published Published
Law-enforcement guide published The inventory of records that exist, before you ask. Not published Published
Log retention stated as a number Hours or days, not “minimal” or “as required”. Not published Published
A separate legal entity per jurisdiction So a judgment in one country does not reach the servers in another. Not published Published
Uptime SLA credited automatically Credited from the published incident record, with no claim form. Published Published
DDoS mitigation included On every product, at no extra charge, with no protected-IP upsell. Published Published
Bare metal, GPU and colocation Beyond virtual machines, on the same account and policy. Published Published

On eight of the twelve rows above, this estate publishes an answer and we could not find one published there. Tell us if a row is wrong

Included, or purchased

When mitigation is the product it is priced as the product, and the protected tier costs more than the unprotected one. That is coherent and it is how most of this industry works.

Here it is a default: always-on at every edge, on every product, with no per-attack fee and no protected-IP upsell. For a target under constant, tuned attack a specialist may still be the better answer, and this page is not going to pretend a default beats a dedicated team.

Hong Kong is a jurisdiction decision now

Hong Kong’s legal position has changed materially in recent years, and for content that attracts political attention it is no longer the neutral routing choice it was. That is not a criticism of the host; it is a fact about the map, and choosing on the law rather than the latency is what the jurisdictions guide is for. Our Asian region is Singapore.

What is published

Parts of the catalogue are quoted rather than priced, and the process rows are blank. Every price here is on one page, and the canary, the transparency report and the record inventory are linked from every comparison in this section.

Questions people actually ask

Is your mitigation as good?

For ordinary volumetric attacks, it is on before you notice and there is no charge. For a sustained campaign against a specific target with a hand-tuned profile, a specialist is a reasonable thing to buy and we will say so.

Do you have Hong Kong?

No. Singapore is the Asian region, and the network page gives its carriers and its uptime record rather than an adjective.

Buy theirs instead if

  • You are under sustained attack and want a supplier whose whole business is that problem.
  • Hong Kong is where the audience is and latency decides it.
  • You need mitigation tuned by hand for an unusual protocol, which a default cannot do.

That list is here because a comparison that cannot name a reason to buy the other one is an advertisement. If any of those three is you, they are the better buy and this page has done its job.

Every price on this estate is published in full, in one place. See the whole catalogue

Others of the same kind

Sold on the takedown question. Where the jurisdiction is real, and where it is a policy on a server somewhere ordinary.

All 35 comparisons