Locations are not jurisdictions
A long location list looks like resilience and is usually a rack contract in each city under one company. That is fine and normal; it just means the number of cities and the number of courts are different numbers.
Here the two numbers match: eight regions, eight companies, each on its own country’s register. It is the reason a ruling against one does not reach the others, and it is the row worth reading twice.
Same price everywhere
Every region here costs the same, so choosing where to sit is a legal decision rather than a budget one. That is deliberate: charging more for the jurisdiction people actually need would be charging for the product this estate exists to sell.
What is not published
The canary, the transparency figures, the record inventory and the retention number are the four documents this whole section keeps returning to, and they are the difference between a stated position and a checkable one.
Questions people actually ask
Do you have my city?
Possibly not. The eight regions are listed with their carriers, and if the answer is no then a host with the right city is the better buy for a latency-bound workload.
Is crypto enough to be private?
No. Paying in Bitcoin leaves a public ledger and leaves the identity question to the signup form. Both halves have to be answered, which is what the payments page is about.
Buy theirs instead if
- You want a specific European city and they have it and we do not.
- Latency to a particular market is the decision and the legal question is settled for you.
- Price is tight and the process rows are not part of your evaluation.
That list is here because a comparison that cannot name a reason to buy the other one is an advertisement. If any of those three is you, they are the better buy and this page has done its job.
Every price on this estate is published in full, in one place. See the whole catalogue