NiceVPS, comparedAnonymous is the easy half. Checkable is the other half.

NiceVPS does the anonymous part properly: an address is optional, Monero is first-class, and nothing about the signup pretends otherwise. The difference is everything that happens after the order.

6 minute read · Their pages last read 30 июля 2026 · Corrections welcome

The one you are looking at

NiceVPS

Where: Netherlands, Romania
Site: nicevps.net

What they are genuinely good at

Genuinely minimal signup, with Monero treated as the default rather than an afterthought.
Tor-friendly by disposition rather than by exception.
Small enough that a support message reaches a person who can act on it.

This estate

DediPrivacy

Where: eight jurisdictions, eight companies
Site: dediprivacy.com

What we publish that most do not

Every price, including bare metal, GPU by the second and colocation.
A signed warrant canary, a quarterly transparency report and the inventory of records that exist.
Mitigation on before an attack starts, and an SLA that credits itself from the incident record.

Row by row

What each of us publishes.

Not what each of us believes. Every row below is a page you can open on either site, or an answer that is not there.

Their column reflects their own public pages, read on 30 июля 2026. marks a thing we could not find published — it is not a claim that they do not do it.
Published?	NiceVPS	DediPrivacy
Sign up without identity documents No name, no address, no document, at any spend level.	Published	Published
Settles in cryptocurrency Accepted as payment, not as a gift-card workaround.	Published	Published
Accepts Monero The only widely accepted asset that is private by default.	Published	Published
Every price published The whole catalogue on a page, with no “contact us” tier.	Published	Published
Signed warrant canary Cryptographically signed, dated, and on a schedule.	Not published	Published
Transparency report with figures Notices received, and how many were acted on.	Not published	Published
Law-enforcement guide published The inventory of records that exist, before you ask.	Not published	Published
Log retention stated as a number Hours or days, not “minimal” or “as required”.	Partly	Published
A separate legal entity per jurisdiction So a judgment in one country does not reach the servers in another.	Not published	Published
Uptime SLA credited automatically Credited from the published incident record, with no claim form.	Not published	Published
DDoS mitigation included On every product, at no extra charge, with no protected-IP upsell.	Not published	Published
Bare metal, GPU and colocation Beyond virtual machines, on the same account and policy.	Partly	Published

On eight of the twelve rows above, this estate publishes an answer and we could not find one published there. Tell us if a row is wrong

The rows that are blank are the argument

On the four rows most people shop for — no documents, crypto, Monero, prices on the page — there is nothing between us and the table says so plainly.

The distance opens on the rows underneath: a signed canary, a quarterly count of demands, an inventory of the records that exist, a retention figure in hours. Those are documents rather than promises, and they are the only part of a privacy claim a buyer can hold somebody to. See what we hold.

One supplier, or one per country

A host operating in two countries under one company is reachable by one court. This estate runs eight regions, each held by a separate company on its own register, which is the difference between a complainant winning once and a complainant having to win eight times.

What happens when it grows

If a project needs bare metal, a GPU by the hour or a rack, a virtual-machine-only catalogue means a second supplier and a second policy to read. Everything here is on one price list, on one account and one balance.

Questions people actually ask

Do you accept Monero too?

Yes, and it is the only one of the eight assets on the payments page that is private by default. We say that rather than listing it alongside the others as though they were equivalent.

Is a bigger host worse for privacy?

Not inherently. What scale buys is the ability to keep publishing documents that cost real work — a quarterly report is only evidence if it appears in the quarters where nothing interesting happened.

Buy theirs instead if

Anonymity at the point of purchase is the whole requirement and you will never need more than a virtual machine.
You want to pay in Monero and would rather not explain why.
A smaller supplier suits you and you accept less documentation as the price of it.

That list is here because a comparison that cannot name a reason to buy the other one is an advertisement. If any of those three is you, they are the better buy and this page has done its job.

Every price on this estate is published in full, in one place. See the whole catalogue