FlokiNET, comparedFlokiNET is good. Here is exactly where we differ.

FlokiNET has hosted work that needed hosting when nobody else would, and that record is not something a comparison table improves on. What follows is the narrower question: what each of us publishes, and which of those differences would change your decision.

8 minute read · Their pages last read 30 июля 2026 · Corrections welcome

The one you are looking at

FlokiNET

Where
Iceland, Romania, Finland
Site
flokinet.is

What they are genuinely good at

  • A stated mission around journalists, whistleblowers and human-rights work, and years of acting on it.
  • Three jurisdictions, including Iceland, whose constitutional protection for speech is genuinely unusual.
  • A long, visible track record in a niche where most brands are two years old.

This estate

DediPrivacy

Where
eight jurisdictions, eight companies
Site
dediprivacy.com

What we publish that most do not

  • Every price, including bare metal, GPU by the second and colocation.
  • A signed warrant canary, a quarterly transparency report and the inventory of records that exist.
  • Mitigation on before an attack starts, and an SLA that credits itself from the incident record.

Row by row

What each of us publishes.

Not what each of us believes. Every row below is a page you can open on either site, or an answer that is not there.

Their column reflects their own public pages, read on 30 июля 2026. marks a thing we could not find published — it is not a claim that they do not do it.
Published? FlokiNET DediPrivacy
Sign up without identity documents No name, no address, no document, at any spend level. Published Published
Settles in cryptocurrency Accepted as payment, not as a gift-card workaround. Published Published
Accepts Monero The only widely accepted asset that is private by default. Published Published
Every price published The whole catalogue on a page, with no “contact us” tier. Published Published
Signed warrant canary Cryptographically signed, dated, and on a schedule. Published Published
Transparency report with figures Notices received, and how many were acted on. Not published Published
Law-enforcement guide published The inventory of records that exist, before you ask. Not published Published
Log retention stated as a number Hours or days, not “minimal” or “as required”. Not published Published
A separate legal entity per jurisdiction So a judgment in one country does not reach the servers in another. Not published Published
Uptime SLA credited automatically Credited from the published incident record, with no claim form. Not published Published
DDoS mitigation included On every product, at no extra charge, with no protected-IP upsell. Not published Published
Bare metal, GPU and colocation Beyond virtual machines, on the same account and policy. Partly Published

On seven of the twelve rows above, this estate publishes an answer and we could not find one published there. Tell us if a row is wrong

The jurisdictions are different in kind, not degree

FlokiNET publishes Iceland, Romania and Finland. All three are outside the reach of a US takedown notice, and Iceland in particular has constitutional speech protection that is worth what it says. That is a real answer to the question most people are asking.

This estate publishes eight jurisdictions, and the reason is not that eight is a bigger number. It is that each one is a separate company on its own country’s register, so a ruling obtained against the Panamanian entity is not enforceable against the Icelandic one without starting again in Iceland. If your concern is a well-resourced complainant who will follow you, the structure matters more than the flag. See who operates the estate for the entity list.

What each of us publishes about process

This is where the table above is doing real work, and it is worth reading the “not published” rows carefully. They do not mean FlokiNET keeps logs, or that it hands things over. They mean we could not find a page saying what it keeps and for how long.

The distinction matters because a promise you cannot check is a promise that costs nothing to make. This estate publishes a law-enforcement guide listing every record that exists, a transparency report with the count of notices received and the count acted on, and a retention figure in hours. You do not have to believe any of it on trust; you can read it before you buy and hold it against us afterwards.

Range, and why it eventually matters

FlokiNET sells virtual machines and dedicated servers. That covers most of what most people need, and if it covers what you need then this section is not an argument.

It becomes one when a project grows sideways. This estate runs VPS, Windows RDP, bare metal, GPU nodes by the second, private cloud, object and block storage, web hosting and colocation from a quarter rack upward — on one account, one balance and one policy. Moving from a virtual machine to a rack here is a configurator step; moving between two hosts is a migration.

Paying, and what it reveals

Both of us take cryptocurrency and both of us take Monero, which puts us in the small group that has actually thought about this. There is no meaningful difference to report and it would be dishonest to invent one.

Questions people actually ask

Is this page saying FlokiNET is bad?

No, and the section above says the opposite. FlokiNET has a record this estate does not have yet. The comparison is about published process and product range, and on those two things we are making a specific claim you can check.

Why are so many rows marked “not published”?

Because that is what we found, and the alternative was to guess. If FlokiNET publishes a transparency report or a retention figure and we missed it, tell us and the row changes the same day.

Can I move an existing FlokiNET server here?

Yes, and an engineer does the work. The migration service is free, including the rsync window and the DNS cutover.

Buy theirs instead if

  • You want a host whose stated purpose is protecting publication, and that matters to you more than the size of the catalogue.
  • You are placing a single site or a single server and will not need bare metal, GPU or a rack later.
  • You would rather buy from an operator with ten years behind it than from one with a longer price list.

That list is here because a comparison that cannot name a reason to buy the other one is an advertisement. If any of those three is you, they are the better buy and this page has done its job.

Every price on this estate is published in full, in one place. See the whole catalogue