Bahnhof, comparedA public record of refusing. A conventional account underneath it.

Bahnhof fought Swedish data retention in public and won concessions, and hosted things other Swedish operators would not. That is a record, and this page is not going to pretend it is worth less than a document.

7 minute read · Their pages last read 30 July 2026 · Corrections welcome

The one you are looking at

Bahnhof

Where: Sweden
Site: bahnhof.net

What they are genuinely good at

A public, litigated record of resisting data-retention obligations rather than describing itself as privacy-friendly.
Serious Swedish infrastructure, including facilities built to a standard almost nobody matches.
Scale and continuity: an operator that will be there next year.

This estate

DediPrivacy

Where: eight jurisdictions, eight companies
Site: dediprivacy.com

What we publish that most do not

Every price, including bare metal, GPU by the second and colocation.
A signed warrant canary, a quarterly transparency report and the inventory of records that exist.
Mitigation on before an attack starts, and an SLA that credits itself from the incident record.

Row by row

What each of us publishes.

Not what each of us believes. Every row below is a page you can open on either site, or an answer that is not there.

Their column reflects their own public pages, read on 30 July 2026. marks a thing we could not find published — it is not a claim that they do not do it.
Published?	Bahnhof	DediPrivacy
Sign up without identity documents No name, no address, no document, at any spend level.	No	Published
Settles in cryptocurrency Accepted as payment, not as a gift-card workaround.	Not published	Published
Accepts Monero The only widely accepted asset that is private by default.	Not published	Published
Every price published The whole catalogue on a page, with no “contact us” tier.	Partly	Published
Signed warrant canary Cryptographically signed, dated, and on a schedule.	Not published	Published
Transparency report with figures Notices received, and how many were acted on.	Partly	Published
Law-enforcement guide published The inventory of records that exist, before you ask.	Partly	Published
Log retention stated as a number Hours or days, not “minimal” or “as required”.	Partly	Published
A separate legal entity per jurisdiction So a judgment in one country does not reach the servers in another.	No	Published
Uptime SLA credited automatically Credited from the published incident record, with no claim form.	Published	Published
DDoS mitigation included On every product, at no extra charge, with no protected-IP upsell.	Partly	Published
Bare metal, GPU and colocation Beyond virtual machines, on the same account and policy.	Published	Published

On ten of the twelve rows above, this estate publishes an answer and we could not find one published there. Tell us if a row is wrong

Resisting retention is not the same as collecting nothing

Bahnhof’s fight was about how long a Swedish operator must keep records. It was a real fight with a real outcome, and the records in question still exist while they are held.

The approach here is upstream of that argument: an email address, a password hash, a balance and a service record are the whole inventory, access logs are destroyed after 24 hours, and no IP history or netflow is collected at all. That is on the privacy page as a number rather than a sentiment. A retention rule cannot compel what was never written down.

Sweden, and eight companies

Sweden is a good jurisdiction and one jurisdiction. The structure here spreads the same idea across eight registered companies, so a ruling in one country does not travel to the servers in another.

Buying

Bahnhof is an account manager and a contract. This is a configurator that prices a build without an account and a machine live in about fifty-five seconds. Neither is better; one of them is better on a Sunday.

Questions people actually ask

Is Sweden still a good jurisdiction?

For speech, yes, and we run no Swedish region only because eight was where the structure settled. The regions we do run are listed with the entity behind each one.

Can I pay Bahnhof in crypto?

We could not find it published, which is what the row says. Here it is the only way to pay — eight assets, no cards and no processors.

Buy theirs instead if

You want a Swedish supplier with scale and a litigated record, and being a named customer is fine.
Colocation in a facility of that quality is the actual requirement.
Continuity matters more to you than anonymity does.

That list is here because a comparison that cannot name a reason to buy the other one is an advertisement. If any of those three is you, they are the better buy and this page has done its job.

Every price on this estate is published in full, in one place. See the whole catalogue