Njalla, comparedNjalla owns it for you. We let you own it, anonymously.
Njalla’s idea is genuinely clever and widely misunderstood: they are not hiding your name behind a privacy service, they are the actual registrant or customer, and you hold a contract with them. That is stronger than a WHOIS proxy and weaker than ownership, and which of those matters depends entirely on what you are doing.
8 minute read · Their pages last read 30 July 2026 · Corrections welcome
The one you are looking at
Njalla
Where
Nevis, with servers in Sweden
Site
njal.la
What they are genuinely good at
A structurally different answer to anonymity: there is no record of you to leak, because the record names them.
Domains as well as servers, which is a genuine gap in most privacy hosts’ offering.
A team with a long and public history of not folding under pressure.
This estate
DediPrivacy
Where
eight jurisdictions, eight companies
Site
dediprivacy.com
What we publish that most do not
Every price, including bare metal, GPU by the second and colocation.
A signed warrant canary, a quarterly transparency report and the inventory of records that exist.
Mitigation on before an attack starts, and an SLA that credits itself from the incident record.
Row by row
What each of us publishes.
Not what each of us believes. Every row below is a page you can open on either site, or an answer that is not there.
Their column reflects their own public pages, read on 30 July 2026. marks a thing we could not find published — it is not a claim that they do not do it.
Published?
Njalla
DediPrivacy
Sign up without identity documentsNo name, no address, no document, at any spend level.
Published
Published
Settles in cryptocurrencyAccepted as payment, not as a gift-card workaround.
Published
Published
Accepts MoneroThe only widely accepted asset that is private by default.
Published
Published
Every price publishedThe whole catalogue on a page, with no “contact us” tier.
Published
Published
Signed warrant canaryCryptographically signed, dated, and on a schedule.
Not published
Published
Transparency report with figuresNotices received, and how many were acted on.
Not published
Published
Law-enforcement guide publishedThe inventory of records that exist, before you ask.
Partly
Published
Log retention stated as a numberHours or days, not “minimal” or “as required”.
Not published
Published
A separate legal entity per jurisdictionSo a judgment in one country does not reach the servers in another.
Partly
Published
Uptime SLA credited automaticallyCredited from the published incident record, with no claim form.
Not published
Published
DDoS mitigation includedOn every product, at no extra charge, with no protected-IP upsell.
Not published
Published
Bare metal, GPU and colocationBeyond virtual machines, on the same account and policy.
No
Published
On eight of the twelve rows above, this estate publishes an answer and we could not find one published there. Tell us if a row is wrong
Two different things are being called anonymity
With Njalla, the asset is theirs. They register the domain, they hold the server, and your relationship is a contract that says they will act on your instructions. Nothing anywhere records you, which is the strongest privacy property on this page.
With this estate, the asset is yours — the account, the server, the addresses — and what is missing is any information about who you are. We never learn a name, a country or a document, so there is nothing to disclose, but the thing you bought is in your hands.
Where the two models actually diverge
Njalla’s model is at its best on domains, where the registrant field is a public database and the only real fix is to not be in it. This estate does not sell domains, and if that is your problem then Njalla solves it and we do not.
A proxy arrangement makes some questions unanswerable by design. If the customer of record is somebody else, a transparency report about requests concerning you is not a document that can exist in a useful form.
This estate answers them directly instead: what records exist, for how long, how many demands arrived last quarter and how many produced anything. Neither approach is wrong. One removes the question, the other answers it.
Questions people actually ask
Can I use both?
Plenty of people do, and it is a sensible arrangement: the domain at Njalla, where the registrant field is the exposure, and the infrastructure here, where the SLA and the hardware range are. Nothing about either prevents it.
Do you sell domains?
No. It is a different business with different failure modes and we would rather not pretend otherwise on a page about honesty.
If the asset is mine, what stops you being made to hand it over?
Nothing stops a court with jurisdiction over the entity that holds the server. What we can say is what we hold, which is in the law-enforcement guide: an email address, a password hash, a balance and a service record. There is no identity to surrender because none was ever collected.
Buy theirs instead if
You need the domain and the hosting to be anonymous, and the domain is the part you are worried about.
You would rather have no record of yourself anywhere than a record of an account with no name attached to it.
A virtual machine is all you will ever need, and you are content that the asset is legally theirs.
That list is here because a comparison that cannot name a reason to buy the other one is an advertisement. If any of those three is you, they are the better buy and this page has done its job.