Where the difference actually is
OVH will ask who you are, will take a card, and will answer a complaint through a process designed to protect OVH. That is the right way to run a company of that size and it is the whole of what people are escaping when they search for this.
This estate asks for an address and a password, takes eight crypto assets and nothing else, and publishes the complete list of records that exist so you can see in advance what a valid order would produce.
Mitigation: the one row where we agree
OVH includes anti-DDoS as standard and it works. So does this estate, at every edge, with no per-attack fee. There is no difference worth manufacturing here and the table says so.
France, and how many courts
France is outside American copyright law and inside a European regime with an active practice of addressing hosting providers. One company holds the estate, so one ruling reaches it. Eight companies is the structural answer to that, and it is the thing that is expensive to copy.
Questions people actually ask
Is OVH DMCA-ignored?
A French company is not bound by 17 U.S.C. §512, so an American notice is correspondence. What follows a French or European complaint is a different question, and the honest answer is that a company that size resolves them rather than litigates them.
Do you have their scale?
No. Eight regions, published with their carriers and their uptime record. If you need thirty regions and managed Kubernetes, buy theirs.
Buy theirs instead if
- You need scale, managed services or certifications that a small estate cannot offer.
- Being an identified customer with a contract is required on your side.
- Their bare-metal range and pricing fit the workload precisely.
That list is here because a comparison that cannot name a reason to buy the other one is an advertisement. If any of those three is you, they are the better buy and this page has done its job.
Every price on this estate is published in full, in one place. See the whole catalogue