AlexHost, comparedMoldova is genuinely outside the usual reach. The rest is unpublished.

AlexHost is priced well and Moldova is a real answer to the jurisdiction question — it sits outside the EU and outside the reach of a US notice. The differences are almost entirely in what is written down.

7 minute read · Their pages last read 30 июля 2026 · Corrections welcome

The one you are looking at

AlexHost

Where
Moldova
Site
alexhost.com

What they are genuinely good at

  • Competitive pricing, and a jurisdiction that is genuinely outside both the EU and US reach.
  • A clear DMCA-ignored position stated plainly rather than hedged.
  • A broad catalogue for the size of the operation.

This estate

DediPrivacy

Where
eight jurisdictions, eight companies
Site
dediprivacy.com

What we publish that most do not

  • Every price, including bare metal, GPU by the second and colocation.
  • A signed warrant canary, a quarterly transparency report and the inventory of records that exist.
  • Mitigation on before an attack starts, and an SLA that credits itself from the incident record.

Row by row

What each of us publishes.

Not what each of us believes. Every row below is a page you can open on either site, or an answer that is not there.

Their column reflects their own public pages, read on 30 июля 2026. marks a thing we could not find published — it is not a claim that they do not do it.
Published? AlexHost DediPrivacy
Sign up without identity documents No name, no address, no document, at any spend level. Partly Published
Settles in cryptocurrency Accepted as payment, not as a gift-card workaround. Published Published
Accepts Monero The only widely accepted asset that is private by default. Not published Published
Every price published The whole catalogue on a page, with no “contact us” tier. Published Published
Signed warrant canary Cryptographically signed, dated, and on a schedule. Not published Published
Transparency report with figures Notices received, and how many were acted on. Not published Published
Law-enforcement guide published The inventory of records that exist, before you ask. Not published Published
Log retention stated as a number Hours or days, not “minimal” or “as required”. Not published Published
A separate legal entity per jurisdiction So a judgment in one country does not reach the servers in another. No Published
Uptime SLA credited automatically Credited from the published incident record, with no claim form. Published Published
DDoS mitigation included On every product, at no extra charge, with no protected-IP upsell. Partly Published
Bare metal, GPU and colocation Beyond virtual machines, on the same account and policy. Published Published

On eight of the twelve rows above, this estate publishes an answer and we could not find one published there. Tell us if a row is wrong

Where Moldova genuinely helps

Moldova is not in the European Union and has no obligation under US copyright law. For a complainant used to sending a notice and being obeyed, that is a wall, and it is a real one rather than a policy.

This estate does not have a Moldovan region and will not pretend the eight it has are a superset of every useful jurisdiction. What it has is eight regions each held by its own company, which answers a different question: not “how far is this from Washington” but “how many separate courts would somebody have to win in”.

The rows that are blank

Almost every process row above reads “not published”. That is not an accusation; it is the state of the public pages on the date at the top.

It matters because the whole proposition in this market is trust, and trust that cannot be checked is just branding. A signed canary on a schedule, a quarterly count of demands and a list of the records that exist are the three documents that turn a claim into something you can hold somebody to.

Questions people actually ask

Is Moldova safer than Panama?

For a US complainant, both are outside reach. Panama additionally has no data-retention obligation of the European kind and the entity there is Panamanian. The guide compares them properly instead of ranking them.

You are more expensive. Why?

Mitigation on every product at no charge, an SLA that credits itself, eight entities to maintain, and a published record that costs real work to keep honest. If none of that is worth the difference, buy the cheaper one.

Buy theirs instead if

  • Price is the constraint and Moldova suits the content.
  • You are serving eastern Europe and the routing from Chișinău works for you.
  • You have already decided the published-process question does not matter to you.

That list is here because a comparison that cannot name a reason to buy the other one is an advertisement. If any of those three is you, they are the better buy and this page has done its job.

Every price on this estate is published in full, in one place. See the whole catalogue